Monthly
208 pp. per issue
8 1/2 x 11, illustrated
ISSN
0898-929X
E-ISSN
1530-8898
2014 Impact factor:
4.69

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Winter 1992, Vol. 4, No. 1, Pages 96-105
(doi: 10.1162/jocn.1992.4.1.96)
© 1992 by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Is Cognitive Neuropsychology Plausible? The Perils of Sitting on a One-Legged Stool
Article PDF (1.21 MB)
Abstract

We distinguish between strong and weak cognitive neuropsychology, with the former attempting to provide direct insights into the nature of information processing and the latter having the more modest goal of providing constraints on such theories. We argue that strong cognitive neuropsychology, although possible, is unlikely to succeed and that researchers will fare better by combining behavioral, computational, and neural investigations. Arguments offered by Caramazza (1992) in defense of strong neuropsychology are analyzed, and examples are offered to illustrate the power of alternative points of view.