"A notable work in many respects, with an extremely interesting
discussion of the prospects for giving the semantics of tense in a
tensed metalanguage. Semantics, Tense, and Time
exemplifies the recent, very productive, evolution of the philosophy
of language, with its characteristic amalgam of linguistics,
metaphysics, and logic."
-- James Higginbotham, Professor of General
Linguistics, University of Oxford
According to Peter Ludlow, there is a very close relation between the
structure of natural language and that of reality, and one can gain
insights into long-standing metaphysical questions by studying the
semantics of natural language. In this book Ludlow uses the
metaphysics of time as a case study and focuses on the dispute between
A-theorists and B-theorists about the nature of time. According to
B-theorists, there is no genuine change, but a permanent sequence of
events ordered by an earlier-than/later-than relation. According to
the version of the A-theory adopted by Ludlow (a position sometimes
called "presentism"), there are no past or future events or times;
what makes something past or future is how the world stands right
now.
Ludlow argues that each metaphysical picture is tied to a particular
semantical theory of tense and that the dispute can be adjudicated on
semantical grounds. A presentism-compatible semantics, he claims, is
superior to a B-theory semantics in a number of respects, including
its abilities to handle the indexical nature of temporal discourse and
to account for facts about language acquisition. Along the way,
Ludlow develops a conception of "E-type" temporal anaphora that can
account for both temporal anaphora and complex tenses without
reference to past and future events. His view has philosophical
consequences for theories of logic, self-knowledge, and memory. As
for linguistic consequences, Ludlow suggests that the very idea of
grammatical tense may have to be dispensed with and replaced with some
combination of aspect, modality, and evidentiality.
|