MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Understanding Both In Coordinate Structures:the Osu Subject Pool Both Surprised Allison and Julie!

 Allison Blodgett and Julie E. Boland
  
 

Abstract:

Coordinate structures entail a local ambiguity which provides fertile testing ground for theoretical models of sentence processing. In a sentence such as "Mary bought vegetables and..." it is not apparent whether "and" must be attached low in the phrase structure tree to conjoin two noun phrases, whether it must be attached higher in the tree to conjoin two verb phrases, or even higher to conjoin two clauses.

Gibson, Schutze, and Salomon (1996) and Cowart (1991) independently noted that the word "both" often marks coordinate structures. Of course, "both" serves many functions, including pronoun (I want both.), (pre-)determiner (I want both desserts.), and quantifier (I both want and need dessert.). Although in some environments "both" need not mark the onset of coordinated NPs, in environments such as (1b) it does signal an upcoming coordinate structure.

We collected sentence completions and conducted a word by word, "stop making sense," reading task to investigate how "both" influences the attachment site of "and."

(1a) Mary sold vegetables and bought seeds at the fair.

(1b) Mary both sold vegetables and bought seeds at the fair.

(1c) Mary sold vegetables and seeds at the fair.

(1d) Mary sold both vegetables and seeds at the fair.

The online results showed the expected garden path effect at "bought" in (1a) compared to the same word position, "seeds," in (1c). This result is compatible with most theories of sentence processing. For example, Late Closure (Frazier, 1978) predicts processing difficulty when the second conjunct is a VP since "and" must be detached from the most recent constituent and reattached higher up the tree. In other theories, processing difficulty might be predicted because of an additional event in the discourse model or an overall preference for coordinated NPs.

Surprisingly, while prenominal "both" (1d) increased the number of coordinated NPs in the completions, preverbal "both" (1b) did not reliably increase the number of coordinated VPs. In the online task, participants actually preferred 1A to 1B. Thus, both the sentence completions and "stop making sense" data show that preverbal "both" is not a lexical marker for coordinated VPs in this subject pool. Rather the scope of preverbal "both" may be the same as that of "just" or "only": Mary (only/just) sold vegetables, not fruits.

Cowart, W. (1991). Mental representations of conjoined noun phrases. Manuscript, Language Sciences Laboratory, University of Southern Maine.

Frazier, L. (1978). On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Connecticut.

Gibson, E., Schutze, C., and Salomon, A. (1996). "The relationship between the frequency and the processing complexity of linguistic structure." Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25:1, 59--92.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo