MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

The Nature of Aberrant Understanding and Processing of Pro-forms by Brain-damaged Populations

 Tracy Love, Janet Nicol, David Swinney and Kelly Nafie
  
 

Abstract:

Kelly Nafie, University of California, San Diego

Recent research investigating the time course of processing capacities and their neuralcorrelates have revealed striking dissociations between overt behavioral deficits and unconscious processing capacities in brain damaged populations (Swinney et al., 1996; Zurif et al., 1994, among others). The current work examines both the real-time processing capacities and final conscious understanding of complex sentence constructions containing explicit pro-forms (pronouns or reflexives) by Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics, Right hemisphere damaged (RHD) subjects, and unimpaired control subjects.

In the on-line portion of this study, subjects heard (in a within-Ss, counterbalanced design) modified sentences taken from Nicol (1988) such as:

The doctor i said that the skier j in the hospital had blamed him i / himself j *1 for the recent injury.

These sentences contain an unambiguous link between the pronoun (him) and the antecedent (doctor) and the reflexive (himself) and its antecedent (skier). In many prior on-line experiments employing the cross modal priming paradigm, this design has been used successfully in demonstrating re-activation of antecedents when the pro-form is encountered (see, e.g., Nicol, 1988; Love and Swinney, 1996; Swinney et. al., 1996). For simplicity, we probed for re-activation at the offset of the pro-form (*1) and examined for the critical 2nd NP pattern of activation.

Our findings reveal that like unimpaired individuals, Wernicke's and RHD patients demonstrate re-activation of the structurally correct antecedent (skier) to the reflexive, and, importantly, no reactivation of this same (but here structurally incorrect) antecedent when the pro-form was a pronoun. This was not the case for Broca's aphasics who showed an aberrant priming pattern: facilitation for skier after processing the pronoun. Here the normal structurally guided co-referential reflex is disrupted, suggesting that the neural region typically defined as Broca's area plays a critical role in the automatic syntactic reflexes underlying auditory sentence comprehension.

The off-line portion of this study tested the subjects' conscious understanding of these same materials. After hearing these sentences, subjects answered basic comprehension questions which targeted the understanding of the ronouns and reflexives in the sentence. Results demonstrated that both Broca's and Wernicke's aphasics have difficulty with the overt comprehension of both types of explicit pro-forms whereas the RHD population demonstrated near perfect comprehension. Together, the findings of both studies suggest that the comprehension difficulties encountered in Broca's aphasia result from damage to an area involved in the automatic grammatical processes critical in comprehending grammatically complex sentences while comprehension problems in Wernicke's aphasia results from a disruption in a later stage involved in the final interpretation of linked relationships.

Love, T., and Swinney, D. (1996). Coreference Processing and Levels of Analysis in Object-Relative Constructions; Demonstration of Antecedent Reactivation with the Cross-Modal Priming Paradigm. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25:1, 5-24.

Nicol,J. (1988). Coreference processing during sentence comprehension. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.

Swinney, D., Zurif, E., Prather, P. and Love, T. (1996). Neurological distribution of processing operations underlying language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8:2, 174-184.

Zurif, E., Swinney, D., Prather, P. and Love, T. (1994). Functional localization in the brain with respect to syntactic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 487-497.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo