MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Some Arguments Against the Existence of Invisible but theoretically predicted reanalysis effects

 Matthias Schlesewsky, Douglas Saddy, Gisbert Faneslow and beim Graben Peter
  
 

Abstract:

In some structures in German involving a filler gap ambiguity one can observe a contrast in the visibility of a reanalysis effect that is related to the type of the disambiguating item, as exemplified in (1).

(1) a. welche Frau sah der Mann which woman saw-sg the-nm man

b. welche Frau sah den Mann which woman saw-sg the-acc man

c. welche Frau sahen die Manner which woman saw-pl the-nm men-pl

The experimental data reported by Meng (1997) and Schlesewsky et al. (1997) show an advantage for a SOV order if disambiguation is effected by number agreement, as exemplified in (1c). But in most constructions no effect is observed if Case is the disambiguating factor, (1a/b). To further address this issue, we present the results of an ERP-study and of a sentence repetition task both of which confirm the absence of a Case dependent reanalysis effect as in (1a/b). The absence of a reanalysis effect in the case condition could be a consequence of the costlessness of this type of ambiguity resolution or a result of an erroneous misinterpretation of the second NP. We discuss experiments which address the question and support the latter. This view, the "attention-driven"strategy, is motivated by the assumption that subjects decide about the validity of an initial preference on the base of any information that they receive during the incremental analysis regardless of whether or not this information is relevant for the filler gap dependency. This strategy is consistent with a human parser that tries to solve ambiguities as soon as possible. For example, in (1a/b) there is a subject preference in the parse. On encountering the verb there is no information that contradicts the preference. Therefore the number agreement on the verb is taken as evidence in support of the subject preference analysis. Since there is apparent number support for the preferred parse, the Case information on the second NP is not attended to. In order to vary the visibility of case information on the final phrase we contrasted sentences where the second argument was realized as a pronoun instead of a full DP. In this condition we found a higher reaction time on the nominatively marked pronoun. This finding is consistent with the so-called "attention-driven" strategy above.

Taken together, these findings shed a interesting light on the discussion of the nature of reanalysis.

Meng, Michael (1998) Grammatik und Sprachverarbeitung: Psycholinguistische Untersuchungen zur Berechnung syntaktischer Strukturen. Unpublished manuscript, University of Jena.

Schlesewsky, M., Fanselow, G. Kliegl, R. and Krems, J. (to appear). Preferences for grammatical functions in the processing of locally ambiguous wh questions in German. In: B.Hemforth L. Konieczny Cognitive Parsing of German. Dortrecht: Kluwer.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo