MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

The Processing of Partial Movement and Wh-scope Marking In German As Revealed In Event Related Brain Potentials

 Thomas Muente and Robert Kluender
  
 

Abstract:

German is one of the languages in which a wh-phrase may move to the specifier position of an embedded clause and yet take scope over the entire sentence ("partial movement"). This is accomplished by means of a wh-expletive occurring in the specifier posi tion of clauses superordinate to the partially moved wh-phrase ("wh-scope marking").

Two theoretical approaches have been proposed to account for this phenomenon. In one, wh-scope marking is assimilated to long-distance movement: the scope marker is base-generated in specifier position and coindexed with the real, partially moved wh-phr ase (van Riemsdijk 1983, McDaniel 1989). In the other approach, wh-scope marking consists of multiple instances of clause-internal wh-movement: both the real wh-phrase and the wh-expletive(s) move from clause-internal positions to the specifier position of their own clause (Dayal 1994, Horvath 1997).

We ran an ERP experiment on 16 native speakers of German with 240 sets of the following stimuli.

Was meinst du,

what think you

(1) hat __?
(2) was der umsichtige Physiker auf eine Diskette gespeichert hat?
(3) ?dass hat?
has
what the cautious physicist onto a diskette stored has
that has

The marginally grammatical condition with a "dass" complementizer (3) was included as a separate manipulation.

We reasoned that if wh-scope marking consists of one partial movement coindexed with base-generated scope markers, it should be processed as a single long-distance dependency. In that case (2) should pattern at least with the grammatical long-distance wh -question (1). If on the other hand wh-scope marking consists of multiple instances of separate movement, then each instance should be processed as a separate dependency. In that case (2) should differ from both long-distance wh-questions, (1) and (3). We predicted that this would be the case, and, based on prior research, expected the scope-marking condition (2) to elicit a slow negative potential relative to (1) and (3) throughout the embedded clause.

Instead, although (2) briefly elicited more left anterior negativity than (1) at the beginning of the embedded clause ("was" vs. "hat"), the two immediately realigned for the duration of the sentence. (3) diverged from both (1) and (2) in eliciting a slo w negative potential with a left anterior maximum throughout the embedded clause.

These data, while unexpected, are in any case consistent with the hypothesis that at least in German, wh-scope marking is treated like long-distance movement. Horvath (1997) concedes that this may in fact be the correct analysis for this language.

Dayal, V. (1994). Scope marking as indirect wh-dependency. Natural Language Semantics, 2, 137-170.

Horvath, J. (1997). The status of "wh-expletives" and the partial wh-movement construction of Hungarian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 15 (3), 509-572.

McDaniel, D. (1989). Partial and multiple wh-movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 7, 565-604.

Riemsdijk, H. van (1983). Correspondence effects and the Empty Category Principle. In Yukio O., H. van Riemsdijk, K. Inoue, A. Kamio, and N. Kawasaki (eds.), Studies in Generative Grammar and Language Acquisition: A Report on Recent Trends in Linguistics, 5-16. Tokyo, JP.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo