MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Referential Context and the Resolution of Subject/object Relative-clause Ambiguities In German

 Sigrid Lipka
  
 

Abstract:

The referential context hypothesis of processing syntactically ambiguous sentences proposes that initial syntactic decisions can be influenced by the contextual plausibility of the alternative syntactic analyses (e.g. Altmann, Garnham and Dennis, 1992). One of the main contextual manipulations studied previously involved introducing two like protagonists versus one protagonist.

Subject/object relative clause ambiguities in German provide an interesting challenge for the referential context hypothesis. A new kind of referential context manipulation is required here - manipulating the number of potential referents is not informative since both resolutions obviously involve a relative clause. Hence both types of context have to mention two possible referents but still provide some information which makes either the subject-relative or the object-relative clause referentially necessary.

German subject vs. object relative sentences are identical up to the clause-final verb which is marked for number (e.g. 'hatte' vs. 'hatten'), signalling either a subject relative (1) or an object relative (2):

(1) das Mädchen, das die Jungen gehasst hatte, ...

the girl that the boys hated had-sg. -- i.e.: the girl that had hated the boys

(2) das Mädchen, das die Jungen gehasst hatten, ...

the girl that the boys hated had-pl. -- i.e.: the girl that the boys had hated

Subject relatives are easier to process than object relatives. In order to investigate whether referential context can override this preference, two contexts were created. Both contexts introduced two girls and some boys (for example). The subject-relative supporting context further stated that one of the girls hated the boys, whereas the object-relative supporting context stated that the boys hated one of the girls. Given the need to establish a unique referent, a subject-relative clause is felicitous following the first context (because a subject relative allows identification of 'the girl' as the girl that had hated the boys), and an object relative is felicitous following the second context (allowing identification of 'the girl' as the girl that the boys had hated). Judgement and production data show that this novel kind of referential context manipulation did override the usual preference for subject relatives over object relatives. These results extend previous evidence for the referential context hypothesis and indicate that readers try to identify a referent not only by taking into account the number of potential referents but by making use of factual information presented in the context, even if this means adopting the object relative which is usually unpreferred.

Altmann, G. T. M., Garnham, A. H., and Dennis, J. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context. Journal of Memory and Language , 31, 685--712.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo