MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

RCC Cannot Compute Certain FSA, Even With Arbitrary Transfer Functions

 Mark Ring
  
 

Abstract:
Existing proofs demonstrating the computational limitations of Recurrent Cascade Correlation (RCC) and similar networks (Fahlman, 1991; Bachrach, 1988; Mozer, 1988) explicitly limit their results to units having sigmoidal or hard-threshold transfer functions (Giles et al., 1995; Kremer, 1996). The proof given here shows that for any finite, discrete transfer function used by the units of an RCC network, there are finite-state automata (FSA) that the network cannot model, no matter how many units are used. The proof also applies to continuous transfer functions with a finite number of fixed points, such as sigmoid and radial basis functions.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo