MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Meaning, Memory, and Modality

 Kara Federmeier and Marta Kutas
  
 

Abstract:
Visual words, auditory words, pictures . . . all can be used to represent the same concept and, in electrophysiological studies, all are associated with a negativity 300-500 millisecond post-stimulus onset ("N400") that varies in amplitude with expectancy. However, these three types of stimuli are processed by different neural systems (which may explain the distributional differences observed to each) and represent information with differing degrees of explicitness. In this series of studies, we examined the functional similarity of the N400 response to these three stimulus types. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) as volunteers read/listened to pairs of sentences for comprehension. The first sentence (e.g., "He caught the pass and scored another touchdown.") set up an expectation for a particular exemplar of a particular category ("sports"), while the second ("There was nothing he enjoyed more than a good game of ...") ended with (1) the expected item ("football"), (2) an unexpected item from the expected category ("baseball"), or (3) an unexpected item from an unexpected category ("chess"). Target items were visual words (Exp. 1) or pictures (Exp. 2) in the reading condition and auditory words (Exp. 3) in the listening condition. All unexpected items elicited an N400. For all words, but not for pictures, N400 was intermediate in amplitude if the unexpected item was from the expected category. The nature of long-term memory access (as indexed by the N400) thus seems to be modality-independent for words but to differ functionally for pictures.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo