MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

A Temporal and Spatial Comparison of Independent Components Analysis and Principal Components Analysis.

 W. Khoe, J. Dien and G.R. Mangun
  
 

Abstract:
Independent components analysis (ICA) is a method used to analyze event related potential (ERP) and functional imaging (fMRI) data. It decomposes overlapping components into linearly independent spatial modes with their associated time courses by finding components that are uncorrelated and independent. Principal components analysis (PCA) is another method used to parse overlapping components by uncovering latent variables that account for the patterns of covariance seen in a data set. In the present study, ICA and PCA were directly compared when applied to various simulated ERP data sets. Each simulated data set consisted of 65 midline channels with 65 time points (Dien, 1998). Components were constructed from half sine cycles, a short P2-like component and a long P3-like component. To compare performance in the two methods, an ICA infomax algorithm (Bell & Sejnowski,1995) and a PCA procedure using varimax and promax rotations were used. We systematically tested the performance of these two methods under various parameters (e.g. number of observations used for analysis, amount of noise, spatial and temporal overlap of components). In addition, ICA and PCA were applied to a real ERP data set acquired from a spatial cueing experiment. The implications and caveats of applying ICA and PCA to ERP data will be discussed.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo