MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

A P300 Test of the Frontal Dorsal Versus Ventral Hypothesis in N-Back Working Memory.

 Patty Ross and Sidney J. Segalowitz
  
 

Abstract:
Goldman-Rakic and Fuster both offer a conceptualization of working memory that emphasizes how prefrontal and posterior cortical areas are linked in reverberatory circuits that keep information on line. Goldman-Rakic argues that these working memory circuits are modality-specific, with dorsal PFC and parietal activation for spatial processing, and ventral PFC and inferior temporal activation when non-spatial or pattern information is key. Cohen (1997) demonstrated fMRI activation of the dorsolateral PFC as a function of load in an n-back working memory task. We employed a similar task to test the modality-specific working memory model using electrophysiological measures, with a spatial condition (position being the matching criterion of letter stimuli presented either 1, 2, or 3 items earlier) and a verbal condition (specific letter to be matched). ERPs to stimuli were recorded from 9 frontal and 9 parietal coronal sites from the extended 10-20 system. P300 analysis indicated no modality-specific differences in the dorsal-ventral plane, although P300 latencies and amplitudes were greater for verbal stimuli, increasing as a function of working memory load. P300 amplitudes were significantly greater at the dorsal sites. Such results accords with fMRI results of increased dorsolateral PFC activation with working memory.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo