MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

The Relationship between Know Responses and Implicit Memory.

 Amy L. Ciaschini and Elizabeth A. Phelps
  
 

Abstract:
It has been suggested that the responses on a recognition memory test can be based on two types of criteria, remember and know (Tulving, 1985). Remember judgments are made when a person has conscious recollection of a study event. Know judgments occur when a person has a sense of familiarity about an item without conscious recollection of the previous experience. There is some disagreement as to whether the processes underlying know judgments are similar to implicit memory processes (Gardiner, 1988; Rajaram, 1993). Amnesics are useful to study this distinction because their explicit memory is impaired while their performance on implicit memory tasks is intact. However, one difficulty comparing amnesics and controls in past experiments has been differences in overall recognition performance. In the present study, we equated overall recognition between amnesics and controls. In Experiment 1, we assessed memory for words and equated overall recognition by increasing the delay between study and test for a control group. In Experiment 2, we assessed memory for pictures instead of words in addition to including a delay control group. A remember/know test was used to measure recognition. When overall recognition is equivalent, the patterns of remember and know responses are similar for amnesics and controls. This suggests that know responses are not driven by implicit memory processes, but instead can be seen as another measure of explicit memory.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo