MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

ERP Repetition Effects to Words And Pictures in an Indirect Task.

 M.M. Schugens, M. Majtanik, I. Daum and M.D. Rugg
  
 

Abstract:
The event-related potential (ERP) repetition effect is characterized by a late more positive-going wave to repeated relative to first presentation stimuli. It can be elicited by words or pictures independently of a response requirement. Investigating ERP repetition effects in cross-form tasks can shed light on issues concerning common or dual-code models of representation during memory processing. Seventeen subjects were presented with 600 stimuli (pictures or names of objects, 800 ms each) on a computer monitor and instructed to press a button when the real object was larger than the monitor. 80 of the stimuli were targets (40 words, 40 pictures). Additionally, there were 50 word-word, 50 picture-picture, 50 word-picture and 50 picture-word repetitions (inter-item lag 1) as well as 120 filler stimuli in quasi-random order. No target stimuli were repeated. EEG averages were formed off-line for the different repetition conditions. ERP repetition effects were statistically reliable for the word-word, picture-picture and word-picture conditions, but not for the picture-word repetition condition and larger at posterior than anterior sites. These findings are more consistent with dual-code than common-code models of representation. The picture-word condition appears to mainly involve perceptual processing of the initially presented picture with relatively little semantic processing. Therefore the subsequently presented object name does not elicit a reliable repetition effect. The word-picture condition requires the mapping of semantic information (the word) onto a perceptual representation in order to permit a size judgement. This perceptual representation can then support an ERP repetition effect to the second, perceptual stimulus.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo