MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Neurophysiological Investigations of Perceptual Implicit Memory: Process vs. Feature Transfer.

 H. E. Schendan and M. Kutas
  
 

Abstract:
People perform better with old than new stimuli, with "priming" being greater if the same rather than a different item is re-presented. This pattern results from reinstantiation of the same perceptual elements or reactivation of the same neural operations, or both. We isolated their individual contributions in two event-related potential (ERP) experiments on Gestalt perceptual grouping processes. Degree of similarity between study and implicit memory test objects (drawn with line segments separated in space) assessed the role of process versus feature transfer in memory. Studied pictures were the same fragments as at test, different fragments than at test, or were complete with continuous contours or segmented but not spatially-separated contours. Early (200 ms) ERP repetition effects are form-specific: P200 effects are absent if studied pictures were complete (no grouping) but present if they were fragmented (grouping) despite differing from test pictures in line location, orientation, or size. Transfer of grouping operations not perceptual features matters. Later repetition effects appear in all conditions: repeating the global form reduced the frontal N400 despite changes in how contours were drawn. This ERP indexes a structural description system implicated in object priming. In sum, we find that implicit memory involves multiple distinct stages, with some stages mediated by transfer of processes, and not just features.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo