| |
Neural Representation of Motion and Cognition Verbs.
|
| | Christian DeVita, Phyllis Koenig, Guila Glosser, David Alsop, James Gee, John Detre, Carol McSorley, Jennifer Morris, Ayanna Cooke and Murray Grossman |
| | |
| |
Abstract:
Evidence from neuroimaging studies and brain-damaged patients
has yielded competing claims regarding the neural representation of
verb meanings. Hypotheses have linked lexical access to perceptual
processes inherent in a word's referent: A verb's physical or
observable action properties may require recruitment of
motor-kinesthetic or visual-perceptual areas, respectively. Verb
stimuli have been limited to imageable action words. This study
used fMRI to compare cerebral activity during semantic processing
of motion and cognition verbs (e.g., climb and assure), using
concrete and abstract nouns or pseudowords as a baseline. Ten young
subjects judged visually presented words for pleasantness. Stimuli
were presented every four seconds, in 40 second word-category
blocks, for a total of six blocks per category. We observed
bilateral posterior activation involving left BA 39 and right BA 18
during verb judgments compared to noun judgments. Separate
contrasts of motion verbs and cognition verbs, using pseudowords as
baseline for each, revealed visual cortex activation (BA 17 and 18)
in both conditions, left BA 39 and right BA 22 for motion verbs,
and bilateral medial frontal (BA 10) and ventral temporal (BA 37)
activation for cognition verbs. These results suggest that action
verbs are not tied to motor-kinesthetic representations in frontal
cortex. Previous studies (e.g., verb generation procedures) may
reflect non-semantic processes such as noun-to-verb
conversion.
|
|
|
|
|