MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Functional Neuroimaging of Sentence Comprehension.

 Ayanna Cooke, Edgar Zurif, Christian DeVita, Carol McSorley, David Alsop, James Gee, Maria Pinango, John Detre, Phyllis Koenig, Guila Glosser, Jennifer Balogh, Hemant Gupta and Murray Grossman
  
 

Abstract:
We hypothesize that grammatically-defined processing demands contribute to sentence comprehension. We monitored cerebral activity with fMRI in seven healthy, right-handed native English speakers while they determined the agent of the action. Each sentence contained an antecedent noun phrase (NP) and a center-embedded clause with a "gap" where the NP is interpreted. Half the sentences contained a seven-word span between NP and gap ("long"); half contained a three-word span ("short"). For each of these two settings, half of the clauses were subject-relative (SR), preserving canonical word order; half were object-relative (OR), violating canonicity. Subjects saw eight 40-sec blocks of each sentence type presented visually word-by-word for 500 and 750 msec/word. SR-short and OR-short sentences activated left posterior-superior temporal cortex. SR-long sentences additionally recruited the right hemisphere homologue. OR-long sentences also activated left inferior frontal, left caudate, and left hippocampal regions. These data suggest that sentence comprehension is sustained by left posterior-superior temporal and inferior frontal regions. Syntactic constraints provided by antecedent-gap linkages in non-canonical sentences attempt to block the construction of a canonical representation. The mismatch between the input and what the cognitive system constructs, in the setting of lengthy antecedent-gap linkages, may require a recovery operation subserved by left inferior frontal cortex.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo