| |
Functional Neuroimaging of Sentence Comprehension.
|
| | Ayanna Cooke, Edgar Zurif, Christian DeVita, Carol McSorley, David Alsop, James Gee, Maria Pinango, John Detre, Phyllis Koenig, Guila Glosser, Jennifer Balogh, Hemant Gupta and Murray Grossman |
| | |
| |
Abstract:
We hypothesize that grammatically-defined processing demands
contribute to sentence comprehension. We monitored cerebral
activity with fMRI in seven healthy, right-handed native English
speakers while they determined the agent of the action. Each
sentence contained an antecedent noun phrase (NP) and a
center-embedded clause with a "gap" where the NP is interpreted.
Half the sentences contained a seven-word span between NP and gap
("long"); half contained a three-word span ("short"). For each of
these two settings, half of the clauses were subject-relative (SR),
preserving canonical word order; half were object-relative (OR),
violating canonicity. Subjects saw eight 40-sec blocks of each
sentence type presented visually word-by-word for 500 and 750
msec/word. SR-short and OR-short sentences activated left
posterior-superior temporal cortex. SR-long sentences additionally
recruited the right hemisphere homologue. OR-long sentences also
activated left inferior frontal, left caudate, and left hippocampal
regions. These data suggest that sentence comprehension is
sustained by left posterior-superior temporal and inferior frontal
regions. Syntactic constraints provided by antecedent-gap linkages
in non-canonical sentences attempt to block the construction of a
canonical representation. The mismatch between the input and what
the cognitive system constructs, in the setting of lengthy
antecedent-gap linkages, may require a recovery operation subserved
by left inferior frontal cortex.
|
|
|
|
|