MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Attention in Depth: Multi-Element Tracking across Different Depths is easier than across Different Colors.

 L. Viswanathan and E. Mingolla
  
 

Abstract:
URPOSE: How does performance in multi-element tracking (Pylyshyn and Storm, 1988, Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197) change when the scene contains elements at differing depths? METHODS: Observers tracked a subset of 16 moving elements. The target set size was 2, 4, 6 or 8. In one experiment, all elements were either at the same depth defined by disparity or at one of two depths. In the latter case, both targets and distractors were divided equally between the two depths, so depth was not predictive of the target vs. distractor distinction. All elements moved smoothly without intersecting one another. In the query phase, observers marked all the elements they had tracked. As a control, a similar experiment was run with elements that were either of the same color or of one of two colors. Five observers did 30 trials per condition in each experiment. RESULTS: Performance in the two-depth case was significantly better than for the one-depth case. No significant difference was found between the one-color and two-color cases. The proportion of variance due to depth was much higher than that due to color. CONCLUSION: If multi-element tracking is performed by perceptually grouping the targets into a single object representation (Yantis, 1992, Cognitive Psychology, 24, 295-340), then it is easier to group them across different depths than across different colors.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo