MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Strategic Effects on Movement Preparation.

 Joerg Sangals, Werner Sommer, Hartmut Leuthold, Yen-Ju Chen and Diana Mietk
  
 

Abstract:
The presented experiments demonstrate that the lateralized readiness potential (LRP)does not only reflect the absolute number of a priori known movement parameters but is also linked to the degree to which advance task information is used strategically for motor preparation. In a 2-choice reaction task, subjects were requested to respond to numbers with extions and flexions of their left or right index finger. The imperative stimulus was always preceded by a precue indicating either response hand alone (partial precue) or response hand and direction (full precue). In Experiment 1, the two precue types were presented mixed or blocked. Blocked presentation of partial precues was assumed to enhance the degree to which hand information was used for advance response preparation. The results indicate neither faster responses nor larger LRP amplitudes in the foreperiod preceding the imperative stimulus in blocked as compared to mixed presentation. However, during mixed presentation immediate precue repetitions decreased response latencies and increased LRP amplitudes as compared to precue alternations. Experiment 2 compared two subject groups being rewarded for speeded responding specifically in either full or partial precue trials. Irrespectively of the assignment, all subjects showed larger foreperiod LRPs for the stressed precue category than for the lenient condition. Therefore, time pressure enhances motor preparedness (as indicated by the LRP) independently of the amount of precued response information.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo