MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Object Recognition in Inferotemporal and Prefrontal Cortices

 Keiji Tanaka, Takeshi Hasegawa, Kenji Matsumoto, Kang Cheng and R. Allen Waggoner
  
 

Abstract:
Area TE of the monkey inferotemporal cortex represents the final pure visual stage of the occipitotemporal pathway, which is essential for visual object recognition. We had previously found that cells in TE respond to moderately complex visual features, that cells responding to similar features cluster in a columnar region, and that columns representing different but related features are located at neighboring positions with partial overlapping. To investigate the roles of these functional structures in object recognition, we have recently conducted two projects with behaving monkeys.

In one project, single-cell activities were recorded from TE of one monkey performing a tacto-visual matching task. The monkey grasped one of 18 differently shaped objects under an opaque plate, and then matched visual objects presented on a display with the grasped object. About 1/5 cells recorded from the dorsolateral part of TE showed stimulus-selective discharges to the grasped objects before the start of the visual image presentation. Tacto-visual matching may occur either 1) in the polymodal areas that receive converging inputs from the visual and tactile pathways, or 2) in the interaction between the modality-specific pathways. The results suggest that the latter is at least partially working.

In the second project, a visually cued GO/NOGO task with reversals was trained on monkeys, and single-cell recordings were made from the ventral regions of the prefrontal cortex, to which TE projects. One of 2 visual patterns was presented as a cue, and after a delay the monkey had to perform either GO or NO-GO motor response depending on the cue. Rewards were asymmetrically provided after either correct GO or correct NOGO responses. The monkeys were trained to quickly learn the stimulus-motor correspondences with daily introduced new visual patterns. They also had to switch or maintain the stimulus-motor correspondences when the motor requirement or the reward condition was reversed. For cells that showed differential responses to the visual patterns, we determined which of the three aspects of stimuli, i.e., 1) the visual features, 2) associated motor responses, or 3) associated rewards, was essential for the responses by testing their activities across both motor and reward reversals. We found that most cells in the orbitofrontal regions represent associated rewards, but not the other two aspects. Although we have not localized the site of stimulus-motor association, the results suggest that the stimulus-motor and stimulus-reward associations separately occur at different brain sites.

In addition to these animal experiments, we are now setting a fMRI system at 4T to realize a non-invasive human imaging with columnar level resolution. We have tried imaging the ocular dominance columns in the human primary visual cortex. By using surface coil and 32-segmented EPI, we have obtained activation patterns consistent with the known properties of the ocular dominance columns.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo