MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Fixation Point Change and the Gap Effect for Ocular and Manual Responses.

 L.G. Gawryszewski and H.C. Hughes
  
 

Abstract:
Saccadic reaction times (SRTs) are reduced when the fixation point (FP) is extinguished prior to the onset of a target. This facilitatory effect has been called the 'gap effect', and has variously been attributed to 1) a facilitated disengagement of active fixation, 2) disengaged attention or 3) warning signal effects. To further clarify the factors contributing to the gap effect, we recorded SRTs and MRTs (simple Manual Reaction Times). The premise is that disengagement of active fixation should selectively influence saccades, whereas warning effects and disengaged attention could influence both SRTs and MRTs. There were 3 task conditions (MRT alone, SRT alone and dual task MRT/SRT), two fixation conditions (an OFFSET condition in which the FP was extinguished and a COLOR CHANGE condition in which the FP changed color) and two gap durations (0 and 200 ms). Our main findings were: 1) no difference between single and dual task conditions; 2) SRTs faster than MRTs, 3) 200 ms gap faster than 0 ms gap, and 4) 4) the difference between the OFFSET and the CC condition was only significant for SRT at gap200. Thus, FP OFFSETs can serve as a significant warning signal, but at 200 ms gap durations, FP OFFSETs also produce an effect that is selective for saccades. Supported by CNPq, FAPERJ, FINEP, PRONEX/MCT, Brazil.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo