MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Semantic interference and syntactic congruity effects in producing phrases

 Marcus Lauer, Gabriella Vigliocco and Markus Damian
  
 

Abstract:
Semantic interference effects and syntactic congruency effects in naming have been established using a picture-word interference paradigm. Schriefers, Meyer & Levelt (1990), for example, found that naming a picture (e.g., dog) was slowed down if the presentation of the picture was immediately preceded by the presentation of a semantically related word (e.g., cat). Using the same paradigm, but requiring participants to produce a noun phrase, a syntactic congruity effect has also been reported for languages such as Dutch (Schriefers, 1993; LaHeij et al. 1998), such that RTs in naming a picture were faster if a word of the same gender was presented at the same time as the picture, compared to when a word of a different gender was presented.

In models of lexical retrieval during production (e.g. Levelt et al., 1999) the semantic interference effect is accounted for in terms of competition between different words that are semantically interrelated. For error-free production to occur, selection of a target "lemma" (i.e., an abstract representation for a word) needs to occur; if competitors are also active, the selection process may be slowed down. The syntactic congruity effect would, instead, occur after lemma selection, as the result of increasing the activation of a "gender node" that is shared between the target and the distractor. Recently, however, researchers (Caramazza and colleagues) have questioned whether the syntactic congruity effect reported in picture-word interference experiments truly reflects changes in the level of activation of a syntactic gender node or whether, instead, it reflects phonological level associations between determiners and nouns.

In a series of three experiments (two completed and the third in progress) we have used a different methodology to assess semantic, syntactic effects as well as their relationship in phrasal production. In the experiments, participants (Dutch-English bilinguals) are presented with blocks of English words written in small or large font and their task is to produce the Dutch phrase corresponding to "Groot/e x" [big-masc/fem x] or "Klein/e x" [small-masc/fem x]. In Dutch, adjectives are marked for gender, therefore allowing us to assess syntactic effects. In experiment 1, we presented participants with blocks of words from the same semantic category (homogeneous) or from different semantic categories (heterogeneous). Latencies to produce Adjs+Ns were slower in the homogeneous condition than in the heterogeneous condition (see Table 1), which can be accounted for along the same lines as the results reported in the picture-word interference paradigm. In the second experiment, words from different categories but belonging to the same gender (homogeneous) or the two different genders (heterogeneous) were presented in blocks. Here we found that speakers were faster in the homogeneous than in the heterogeneous condition. This result is consistent with models which assume the existence of syntactic features abstract from their phonological realization (as in Levelt et al, 1999). In the final experiment, which is currently in progress, we are crossing the semantic and the syntactic manipulation. Results from this final study will speak to the issue of the relationships between lexico-semantic and lexico-syntactic information.

La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J. & Willeboordse, E. The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209-219.
Levelt, W.J.M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A.S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1+.
Miozzo, M., & Caramazza, A. (1999) The selection of determiners in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 907-922.
Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19, 841-850.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo