MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Conceiving beyond Our Means: The Limits of Thought Experiments

 Robert Van Gulick
  
 

Abstract:
How must consciousness supervene on the physical to validate the materialist view that all mental properties, including conscious phenomenal ones, derive from underlying physical structure? It would seem at the least that no two beings with the same underlying physical causal structure and organization could differ in any mental property (leaving aside all the qualifications and nuances that would have to be built in to accommodate the "wide" or contextual dimension of mental states and their contents.)<1)

However neo-dualists, like David Chalmers,2 argue that more is needed since causal supervenience could meet that condition yet not suffice for materialism. Its compatible with property dualism as long as there are nomic connections linking physical and mental properties. According to the property dualist, mental properties are distinct from physical properties in the same way that electromagnetic and gravitational forces are distinct. Just as we can have lawlike links between fundamental physical properties, so too the neo-dualist claims we can have lawlike relations among fundamental physical and mental properties. Given the existence of such natural laws, it may be nomically impossible to have a mental difference without a physical difference. If so, systems globally alike in all physical respects must as a matter of nomic necessity be alike in all mental respects

Full text of article

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo