MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Pseudonormal Vision and Color Qualia

 Martine Nida-Rümelin
  
 

Abstract:
1     Pseudonormal Vision and Functionalism

Is it possible that a person who behaves just like you and me in normal life situations and applies color words to objects just as we do and makes the same color discriminations, see green where we see red and red where we see green? Or, to put the same question from another perspective: Is it possible that you are yourself red-green inverted with respect to all or most other people and that you thus are and have always been radically wrong about what other people see when looking at a sunset or the moving leaves of a tree?

Philosophers normally discuss the possibility of Qualia Inversion by considering thought experiments. But there is, in fact, scientific evidence for the existence of such cases. Theories about the physiological basis of color vision deficiencies together with theories about the genetics of color vision deficiencies lead to the prediction that some people are "pseudonormal." 2 Pseudonormal people "would be expected to have normal color vision except that the sensations of red and green would be reversed-something that would be difficult, if not impossible, to prove." 3 This inversion would affect the perception of any color that contains a red or green component. A greenish blue river would appear violet to a pseudonormal person. Remember, however, that this description will give you a correct idea of what pseudonormal people experience only if you are not yourself one of them. But there is a chance that you are. According to a model of the genetics of color vision deficiencies that was first presented by Piantanida in 1974 pseudonormality occurs in 14 of 10 000 males. 4 It is instructive to see how the prediction of pseudonormal vision follows from the combination of several empirically supported assumptions.

Full text of artcile

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo