MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Comparing the Neural Correlates of Conscious and Nonconsious Categorization Using fMRI

 Paul J. Reber, Darren R. Gitelman and Todd Parrish
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: Previous fMRI studies have found changes in early visual processing areas after nondeclarative (nonconscious) category learning (Reber, Stark & Squire, PNAS, 1998a; Reber, Stark & Squire, Learn&Mem, 1998b) that are distinct from stimulus-correlated activity observed during recognition (conscious) memory. To directly compare these two types of memory, fMRI was used to examine stimulus-correlated activity during categorization after conscious or nonconscious category learning. Participants learned a category of dot patterns from a set of exemplars under either (a) incidental learning conditions in which they were instructed to attend to study patterns with no mention of the categorical structure; or (b) by being told of the underlying category and attempting to learn it. Scanning occurred during a subsequent categorization test. Participants who learned the category incidentally exhibited reduced activity in early visual processing areas for the categorical patterns versus noncategorical patterns, replicating previous results (Reber et al. 1998a,b). In contrast, after the conscious category learning, increased activation was observed in occipital cortex for the categorical patterns, including a region that has been shown to exhibit increased activity for targets during recognition (Reber et al. 1998b). These results suggest that a reduction in activation in visual cortex is associated with nonconscious, nondeclarative memory of the category while the use of conscious category knowledge to judge membership instead evokes recognition-like retrieval processes.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo