MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Difference in Responses to Active and Passive Optic Flow in Area Vip of Monkey

 S. F. Gabel and J. Duysens
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: One of the areas in monkey cortex involved in calculating egomotion through a dynamic environment is the parietal area VIP (Schaafsma and Duysens, J. Neurophys 1996). The purpose of the present study is to see whether VIP is able to account for flow components due to eye movements in the flow pattern, as has recently been shown (by Bradley et al, Science, 1996) for MST, which provides input to VIP. An awake rhesus monkey was required to either fixate a stationary target projected on a translating dot pattern, or track the target across a stationary dot pattern. Both the translation of the pattern and the movement of the target could occur in one of eight directions, at a constant speed of 16 deg/sec. The resulting flow fields on the monkey's retina were highly similar in the two conditions, but the physical origin of the flow differed. Preliminary results show that some neurones (30%) respond to the retinal flow field, regardless of the physical causes of this flow (active or passive), whereas, a smaller proportion of neurones (20%) respond significantly differently during fixation than when the monkey is tracking a target. The remaining cells were in between. These findings indicate that VIP can indeed distinguish between actively induced and passively viewed optic flow.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo