MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Spatiotemporal Differences in Visual Evoked Potentials of First- and Second-order Motion Systems

 Tae-Seong Kim, Zhong-Lin Lu and George Sperling
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: Three systems serve human motion perception: the first-order motion system is sensitive to drifting modulations of luminance, second-order to modulations of texture contrast, third-order to modulations of salience (figure-ground). An Electrical Geodesics system of 128 electrodes was used to measure brain potentials (VEPs) evoked by visual stimuli directed specifically to first- and second-motion systems. Previous studies had found no important differences between VEPs evoked by first- and second-order stimuli, so four critical improvements were made in stimulus construction. (1) The carriers for first- and second-order stimuli were identical, only the moving modulation varied. (2) The first- and second-order stimuli were equated for flicker. (3) The stimuli were balanced for black-white asymmetry so that second-order stimuli did not generate spurious first-order components. (4a) Motion direction changes within first-order and within second-order were measured, not merely motion onsets or terminations. (4b) Changes from first-order to second-order motion were measured for stimuli moving in the same direction. With the contributions of flicker and stimulus onsets equated throughout, the first- and second-order stimuli are perceptually very similar, but VEPs recorded for both presentation types, 4a and 4b, clearly differentiate first- and second-order systems in both temporal pattern and spatial topography. The second-order VEP lags 70-100 msec behind first-order. MEG and fMRI studies to localize these sources are underway.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo