MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Differences in Semantic and Syntactic Processing in foreign language acquisition

 Anja Hahne
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: We examined ERP responses in auditory sentence processing in foreign language acquisition. Participants were native speakers of Russian and learned German as their foreign language. Three types of German sentences were presented auditorily. The sentences ended with a target word that was either (a) correct, (b) semantically incorrect, i.e. violating the selectional restriction of the verb, or (c) syntactically incorrect, i.e. violating the phrase structure. Subjects were asked to judge the correctness of the sentences. In native speakers, these sentences elicited an N400 in the semantic violation condition and an early anterior negativity followed by a P600 in the syntactic violation condition (see Hahne & Friederici, 1998, 1999). Behavioral results showed that the foreign language learners made more errors than native speakers but were clearly above chance level. ERPs on correctly answered trials differed remarkably from those of native speakers. The N400 component in the semantic violation condition had a later onset latency, was reduced in amplitude and longer in duration. Interestingly, in the syntactic violation condition there was no early anterior negativity, a component taken to reflect automatic syntactic parsing procedures. The P600 component was reduced in amplitude. These data suggest different processing mechanisms in foreign language acquisition as compared to native language processing, in particular with regard to automatic syntactic structuring processes.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo