MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Motor Movement, Imagery, and Phantoms: Is It Live or Is It?

 Traci H. Downs, J. Hunter Downs III and Gregory S. Harrington Ph.D
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: Evidence continues to suggest that the neural components used for motor imagery are the same as those used for the motor act including execution. However, we suggest that the difference between an executed motor act and its motor imagery counterpart is a gating mechanism acting within the basal ganglia and controlled by the insular cortex. In our experiment, using fMRI, subjects were asked to flex (curl) the toes of their left foot in one task (MOVEMENT) and imagine (IMAGERY) performing the same action in a second task. Essentially all areas previously implicated, as well as some unreported areas, in motor movement were activated during toe flexion. There are four main differences between the MOVEMENT and IMAGERY tasks: 1) primary motor cortex, is not activated during the IMAGERY condition contrary to the findings of recent fMRI studies; 2) the MOVEMENT task strongly activated superior parietal cortex (Brodmann area 5) but this area does not activate during IMAGERY; 3) substantial differences also exist between the two tasks in terms of the components of the basal ganglia activated; 4) the IMAGERY task produces weaker activation throughout the component areas common to both tasks, a finding has been previously reported. Further fMRI studies have demonstrated that when this task performed with a phantom foot, the activation pattern differs significantly from both MOVEMENT and IMAGERY.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo