MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Motor Programs Are Not Needed to Explain Reaction Time Effects

 Robert M. Kohl, Mark A. Guadagnoli and Haim A. Ben-David
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: Reaction time (RT) that increases as movement difficulty increases is considered to be strong support for the motor program construct (Henry & Rogers, 1960). In this context, since all movement specifications are provided prior to the RT stimulus, increases in RT are attributed to the time it takes to "load" or "unload" a more "detailed" motor program. However, underlying anatomical constraints may simply increase as task complexity increases. Here, RT costs may be explained by the time it takes to activate brain mechanisms with increased constraints. In the present experiment, visual stimuli were mapped to hand/foot dual-responses. Dual ipsilateral hand/foot RTs were 70ms faster than dual contralateral hand/foot RTs. In principle, ipsilateral dual-responses were controlled by a single hemisphere and contralateral dual-responses were controlled by both hemispheres. Hence, since (motor program) hand/foot task complexity was held constant across laterality conditions, the difference in RT is attributed to time costs associated with activating increased (anatomical) control constraints.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo