MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Early Visual Processing Explains Search Accuracy

 Preeti Verghese and Suzanne P. McKee
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: Observers can easily find a simple pattern of dots amidst random dot noise, particularly if the test pattern appears at a known location (Uttal, 1975). It is much harder to find the target pattern when it is presented at an unknown location, because the observer must monitor many potential locations to find it. In a search task, we measured accuracy for finding an oblique target string of five aligned dots presented at an unknown location, as a function of the number of distractors. We used two kinds of distractors -- oriented dot pairs, and randomly-placed dots. Observers judged which of two 200 ms intervals contained the target string. The accuracy for finding the target string among oriented distractors of like orientation was greatly degraded compared to the accuracy for finding the target among randomly-placed distractors. Orthogonally-oriented distractors had almost the same effect as randomly-placed distractors. These results suggest that search for this simple pattern is based on competing responses in oriented neural units in early vision. We successfully modeled these results with an array of multi-scaled oriented units optimally tuned for the target string. To compare the computational results with the search data, the model "chose" the interval with the largest "neural" response. The model also predicts that search should be scale-invariant, in agreement with our results showing nearly constant performance for distances ranging from 0.5 - 2 meters.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo