MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Hemispheric Integration of Competing Dichotic Stimuli

 T.C. Sim
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: The present study investigated interhemispheric cooperation in processing dichotic signals. Eighty participants who were right-handed listened to six trials consisting of six sets of dichotic stimuli with tone-signals on one ear and spoken digits on the other ear. The task was to count the number of tones in each set of signals and to recall them at the end of each trial. Spoken digits on one ear were matching (congruent) or non-matching (incongruent) with tone signals on the other ear. Participants scored significantly higher in the congruent condition, F(1,78) = 31.20, p &lt; .0005, MSE = 2.83, (M = 6.04, SE = .14 for the congruent condition, and M = 4.99, SE = .16 for the incongruent condition). The mean accuracy rate was significantly higher when the spoken digit heard on one ear corresponded with the number of tone signals heard on the other ear, (67.08% versus 55.42%). There was a significant overall left ear advantage (LEA), as hypothesized, F(1,78) = 21.06, p < .0005, MSE = 1.61. When the tone signals appeared on the left ear, the accuracy of the count was higher, with a mean accuracy of 64.86% and 57.64% for the left and right ear respectively (M = 5.84, SE = .140 for the left ear, and M = 5.19, SE = .136 for the right ear). The results suggest that interhemispheric communication may be cooperative or competitive, depending on the task requirement and the nature of the information arriving at each hemisphere,

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo