MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Processing Animals and Tools: Are There Category-specific Brain Systems?

 Tatiana Sitnikova and Phillip Holcomb
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: Non-identical neural systems mediating knowledge about living and nonliving objects have been suggested by a number of neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies. In our lab we have used ERPs, which have high temporal resolution, to show that these category-specific systems may differ not only anatomically but also in their time-courses of operation. That is, pictures of animals elicited larger N300-like anterior negativity, while pictures of tools - larger N400-like posterior negativity. The present study further contrasted processing of animals and tools by recording ERPs to words, rather than pictures, that either were or were not semantically primed by a category name (e.g. animal - dog vs. tool - dog). We hypothesized that the anterior N400 priming effect, previously reported to concrete words and suggested to reflect processing in an image-based semantic system, would reveal activation of semantic representations of objects' imagistic features. However, the posterior N400 effect, thought to be generated in an amodal semantic system, would show processing conceptual characteristics. Results showed that both animals and tools elicited two negative-going components in the N400 time-window, one affected by semantic priming in the frontal-central electrode sites, while another - in the posterior sites. However, the time-course of these components was different between object categories, suggesting that even though knowledge of all objects may depend on the representations/processes in both imagistic and amodal systems, people tend to use these systems differently when process concepts of animals and tools.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo