MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Estimation of Long VS Short Intervals: The Functional Anatomy of Time Estimation Studied with PET

 C Jones, M Jahanshahi, G Dirnberger and CD Frith
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: Ivry (1996) suggested that the timing of short (ms) intervals involves the cerebellum whilst long (seconds or longer) intervals engage the basal ganglia and frontal cortex. We tested this hypothesis using H215O PET. Prior to scanning, the 8 subjects were familiarised with 'short' (500ms) and 'long' (2s) intervals marked by 50ms onset and offset tones. During scanning subjects performed three tasks: short interval estimation, long interval estimation and a control reaction time task. In the timing conditions, a 50ms tone marked interval onset and subjects estimated the long or short interval then pressed a response button to mark the offset. In the control condition subjects pressed the response button as soon as possible after tone presentation. Tone presentation rate was identical across conditions. Short interval estimation increased rCBF in anterior cingulate, middle temporal gyrus, SMA, superior frontal gyrus, the superior and mesial frontal gyrus, caudate nucleus and cerebellum. Long interval estimation significantly activated lateral premotor cortex, SMA, anterior cingulate, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, putamen and cerebellum. More posteriorally, superior and inferior parietal cortex and cuneus were also activated. The findings do not support the hypothesis but suggest that fronto-striatal areas and the cerebellum are significantly activated with estimation of long and short intervals, while more posterior areas are activated during estimation of long intervals.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo