MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Further Evidence for a Criterion Shift in False Recognition Paradigm

 Mary Lane, Michael Miller and George Wolford
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: Many cognitive neuroscience researchers have been using Roediger and McDermott's 1995 associative-word paradigm to create false memories in order to investigate the underlying brain mechanisms of such a psychological state. We maintain that the basic psychological state responsible for the strong false recognition effect is not a "false memory" but a biased response (Miller & Wolford, 1999). By including additional conditions, signal detection analysis demonstrates that the results are consistent with a criterion-shift model. Other researchers have maintained that a storage-based model (Wickens & Hirshman, 1999; Wixted & Stretch, 1999) could also explain our results. In this experiment, we used our modified version of Roediger and McDermott's word paradigm. In addition, subjects were instructed to use either liberal or conservative criteria when judging whether a word was "old" or "new" depending on the color in which the word was presented. A storage-based model predicts uniform effects across item types depending on the instructions. Our criterion-shift model predicts an effect for conservative instructions but no effect for liberal instructions on critical lures (items that subjects respond to very liberally), and it predicts an effect for liberal instructions but no effect for conservative instructions on unrelated items (items that subjects respond to very conservatively). The results confirm a criterion shift hypothesis.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo