MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

What Mechanisms Underlie False Recognition?

 Carmen E. Westerberg and Chad J. Marsolek
  
 

Abstract:
Abstract: We examined memory mechanisms potentially responsible for false recognition. During encoding, participants heard binaurally presented lists of unrelated words and lists of related words (e.g. bed, rest, awake, etc.) each strongly associated with one critical word (e.g. sleep). During test, they made old/new recognition judgments for the critical words, their related words, and the unrelated words, when half of each group were previously presented during encoding and half were not. In addition, visual test words were presented directly to the left or right hemisphere and also varied in the number of (standard-dictionary) senses associated with them. We measured recognition performance using bias and sensitivity measures from signal detection theory. Inconsistent with the theory that the veridicality of memory differs across hemispheres, we did not observe different patterns of sensitivity for the three word types following left- versus right-hemisphere test presentations. Also, inconsistent with the possibility that criterion-setting processes in right- but not left-hemisphere prefrontal cortex support false recognition, the greater bias to respond "old" to critical words compared with other words was not larger following right- than following left-hemisphere test presentations. Finally, in support of the possibility that implicit associative activation of restricted regions in semantic representation space supports false recognition, the greater bias to respond "old" to critical words compared with unrelated words was larger when the test words had small numbers of senses than when they had large numbers of senses.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo