MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Contrasts in Speech Articulation Observed in Sitting and Supine Conditions

 Mark K. Tiede, Shinobu Masaki and Eric Vatikiotis-Bateson
  
 

Abstract:

Although humans normally speak with the head held upright, intelligible speech may be produced from any orientation of the vocal tract; in fact the earliest efforts to control the speech organs ('babbling') typically precede control of physical posture. It is well known that speech production is robust with respect to external perturbation and so unsurprising that articulator movements can be adjusted to compensate for differences in gravitational loading. But because these adjustments do not result in identical articulator trajectories (which would be the case if perfect compensation occurred), systematic comparison of trajectories across speaking postures suggests a means of assessing the relative importance of articulatory targets, in that the most significant of these for intelligible communication are presumably the best controlled and least variable. With this aim we have used the X-ray microbeam system to observe two male Japanese speakers producing sustained vowels,! vowels in a carrier context, CVCV sequences and running speech repeated in sitting and supine phonation postures. Subjects were fitted with tracking pellets on the tongue, mandible, upper and lower lips, plus two for head correction purposes. Results show the least variability in constriction targets, some effect of linguistic structure, and a general pattern of displacement consistent with gravitational direction for articulators not under active control. Acoustics showed minor effects in observed formant bandwidths. A perceptual study found listeners able to distinguish between production types at a level marginally better than chance. In general our results suggest that while speakers adapt readily to the task of supine articulation, their compensation strategies are directed towards maintaining the consistency of their output acoustics rather than rigid preservation of the articulatory trajectories that produce them. While acoustically sensitive targets involving na! rrow constrictions are produced with little variability between postures, unnecessary effort opposing gravity is avoided when it carries little acoustic consequence. Observed posture effects were greatest for sustained vowels and least for running speech, which indicates that the results of MR imaging of sustained production in supine position should be interpreted with some caution.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo