| |
Functional Neuroanatomy of Criterion Attribute and Family
Resemblance Category Learning
|
| | J. I. Tracy, F. Mohamed, S. Faro, A. Pinus, R. Tiver, J. Harvan, C. Bloomer, A. Pyrros and S. Madi |
| | |
| |
Abstract:
Subsystems of category learning have been identified on the
basis of general domains of content (e.g., tools, faces). The
present study examined categories from the standpoint of internal
structure and determined brain topography associated with acquiring
two fundamentally different category structures (criterion
attribute, CA, and family resemblance, FR). CA category learning
involves processing stimuli by isolated features and classifying by
properties held by all members. FR learning involves processing
stimuli by integral wholes and classifying on overall similarity
among members without sharing identical features. fMRI BOLD
response to CA and FR categorization was measured with pseudowords
as stimuli. Category knowledge for both tasks was mastered prior to
brain imaging. Areas of activation emerged unique to the structure
of each category that followed from the nature of the rule
abstraction procedure. Data indicated anterior temporal structures
help attune visual processing procedures to high frequency
components and the discrimination of features to support criterial,
predictive rules. Extrastriate cortex is used when low frequency,
multi-featural information is crucial to rule abstraction.
Categorization based upon differently structured information does
produce distinct brain representations even when it emerges from
the same class of stimulus material.
|
|
|
|
|