MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Colocalization of Conflict Monitoring and Error Detection in Acc

 M. Liotti, D. K. Kothmann, R. Perez III and M. G. Woldorff
  
 

Abstract:
Background. ERP studies of error-related negativity (ERN) have been localized to ACC. PET, fMRI and ERP studies have also identified Stroop interference effects in ACC. Aim. To use high-density ERPs to study localization and time course of Stroop interference and ERN effects in ACC within the same subjects and tasks. Methods. Eight healthy volunteers performed a 4-key manual version of the Stroop task and a 4-key non-color control task. ERPs were averaged separately to stimulus onset and response onset. Results. RT and error analyses produced significant interference effects (mean RT effect: 110 ms). Stroop Interference effect. A significant interference effect (Incongruent word more negative) was present over frontocentral medial scalp (peak=400 ms, p<.001). ERN effect. A significant ERN effect was also present over frontocentral medial scalp, in both the Stroop and control tasks (peak=80 ms, for both, p<.01). Colocalization. Scalp topographies of the Stroop and ERN effects appeared highly similar. Dipole source analyses (BESA) for both effects, seeded with identical coordinates (from PET activations or individual BESA solutions), yielded residual variances of about 10% (one ACC dipole) or 3% (second dipole in frontal cortex). Conclusion. The same region of ACC may be specialized for both conflict monitoring in the Stroop task and in error detection. Dichotomous theories of conflict monitoring and error detection may require reconciliation.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo