MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Neural Correlates of Sinewave Speech Perception.

 E. Liebenthal, J. R. Binder, R. L. Piorkowski and R. E. Remez
  
 

Abstract:
Sinewave analogs of speech are created using tones that follow the center frequency of vocal tract resonances. They lack acoustic attributes of actual vocal sounds and can be perceived as speech or as nonspeech, depending on expectancy. We sought to identify neural correlates of this perceptual shift using functional magnetic resonance imaging. In an auditory task, 16 subjects determined whether a tone (the second formant analog, presented alone) was included in a following three-tone complex. The single tone was either aligned with the other tones in the complex (phonetic stimulus) or temporally reversed (acoustic stimulus). Halfway through the task, subjects were informed about the stimuli and trained to recognize phonemes in the three-tone complexes. Auditory task performance did not change following training. In a subsequent phonetic task using acoustically identical stimuli, subjects identified three-tone complexes containing the phoneme /p/. ANOVA revealed no main effect of stimulus type (phonetic vs. acoustic) in any brain areas. During the acoustic task, activation was reduced in left Heschl's gyrus in the informed relative to the naive condition. Activation increased in the phonetic task relative to the acoustic task in left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG, Brodmann areas 44 and 45). These results implicate the LIFG in phonetic perception. Phonetic training alone did not result in increased brain activation during a purely acoustic task.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo