MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Comparing Reading and Auditory Comprehension in Aphasia

 Jelena Jovanovic and Nina Dronkers
  
 

Abstract:
Several questions regarding reading and auditory comprehension remain unexplored in aphasia research. 1. What is the relationship between reading and auditory comprehension in aphasic patients? 2. Can relative performance in reading and auditory comprehension be related to (a) aphasia type and (b) lesion location? We evaluated these factors in 78 right-handed, single left-hemisphere stroke patients. Reading and auditory comprehension scores, as well as aphasia type, were assessed by the Western Aphasia Battery. Scores were compared across all patients, then clustered to reveal patients with comprehension advantage in one modality. Brain lesion sites were revealed by MRI. To determine common lesioned areas in patients with a modality-specific comprehension advantage, lesion sites were standardized and overlapped. Our results reveal a trend toward poorer reading comprehension across aphasics, with notable exceptions. Broca's aphasics appear to have the worst reading comprehension relative to their auditory comprehension. Wernicke's aphasics show the opposite pattern: in most cases, aphasics of this type have a slight reading comprehension advantage. We conclude that reading and auditory comprehension may be differentially affected in aphasia, and in notable patterns across aphasia types. Lesion analysis revealed a small region of inferior motor cortex spared in patients with better reading comprehension, but lesioned in almost all with auditory comprehension advantage. This result supports the possibility that motor-articulatory processing contributes to reading more than to auditory comprehension.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo