MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Electrophysiological Differences Between Noun and Verb Processing

 A. Scherag, F. Roesler, J. Streb and P. Khader
  
 

Abstract:
It has been suggested that nouns and verbs are processed by topographically distinct cortical cell assemblies. For example, nouns, as functionally related to perceptual entities, should be closely tied to sensory areas while verbs, denoting motor acts, should be tied to motor areas. To objectify such differences we studied the N400 effect for German verbs and nouns in a minimal sentence context. Nouns were primed by a predicate and a subject (e.g. ,Holz" was primed by ,saegen - Tischler" ), while verbs were primed by their fitting subject and object (e.g. ,saegen" was primed by ,Tischler - Holz"). Participants had to silently generate a best matching third word after the primes. After a short delay a target (noun or verb) was presented whose relatedness to the generated word had to be judged. Relatedness between primes and best matching target was varied in four levels. Event-related potentials (from 124 scalp positions referenced to nosetip) and reaction times were measured. RTs were systematically affected by the relatedness between primes and target and by the target word category. Correspondingly, an increase of the negative amplitude within the N400 latency window was observed with decreasing relatedness ratings. The standardized topography between 540 and 720 ms revealed a topographic difference of the N400 effect for nouns and verbs, with a more fronto-parietal maximum for verbs.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo