MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

A Re-evaluation of Phonemic Perception Errors in Auditory Language Comprehension: Studies from Aphasia

 Laura HF Barde, Gregory Hickok, Nicole Gage and Sharon L. Thompson-Schill
  
 

Abstract:
Previous research has shown relatively mild phonemic perception deficits on auditory comprehension tests in aphasia. In these studies, aphasic subjects listened to a word, then selected the picture that best matched the word from a four-choice array. The choices included the correct target (BEAR), a phonemic foil (PEAR), a semantic foil (WOLF), and an unrelated foil (GRAPES). On that task, aphasics performed well overall, and on average committed more semantic errors than phonemic. The present study evaluated whether phonemic processing deficits in aphasia could be revealed using a more sensitive measure. To that end, we redesigned the original task, providing multiple phonemic and semantic foils for each target word. In the new task, half the trials presented all phonemic foils (i.e., BUN/GUN/RUN/SUN), while the other trials presented all semantic foils (i.e., SOCK/HAT/SCARF/GLOVE). Six aphasics were tested on both tasks. The new task proved to be a more sensitive measure of both phonemic and semantic deficits, as 5 of the 6 subjects committed errors on the new task, whereas only two committed errors on the original task. Replicating previous work, aphasics committed almost twice as many semantic errors than phonemic (12% vs. 7%). This evidence provides further support to the idea that phonemic perception deficits make only a small contribution to auditory comprehension problems in aphasia.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo