MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Are Inhibitory Effects in Lexical Decision Lexical or Post-lexical? an Meg Study.

 Liina Pylkkanen, Andrew Stringfellow, Laura Gonnerman and Alec Marantz
  
 

Abstract:
Models of word recognition differ in their placement of inhibition: some treat it as suppression of lexical activation (e.g. Marslen-Wilson 1987) and others as a post-lexical conscious strategy (e.g. Neely 1977, Forster 1981). We investigated the time course of inhibitory effects in lexical decision using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Based on previous studies (Gonnerman 1999, Rastle et al. 2000), we predicted reaction time (RT) inhibition for pairs such as SPINACH-SPIN. In the MEG data, we focused on the M350, a 300-400ms MEG response component, which can be argued to reflect lexical activation. First, the M350 is the first component whose latency predicts the frequency and repetition priming effects on reaction times (RT) (Embick et al., to appear, Pylkkanen et al., to appear). Second, M350 latencies vary independently of RTs in tasks where activation contrasts with the post-access decision process: stimuli with a high phonotactic probability elicit fast M350s due to a sublexical frequency effect but longer RTs due to a neighborhood competition effect which slows down the word/non-word decision (Pylkkanen et al, to appear). The present study used Gonnerman's crossmodal priming materials to test whether the M350s of the targets in SPINACH-SPIN type pairs show shorter latencies, due to phonological priming, or longer latencies, due to inhibition. Post-lexical theories inhibition predict the shorter latencies while lexical theories predict the longer.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo