MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Syntactic Features Are Analyzed Independently of Their Lexical Hosts.

 Mark Allen, Lee Osterhout, Judith McLaughlin, Kayo Inoue and Ian Werkheiser
  
 

Abstract:
We recorded event-related brain potentials (ERPs) while participants read sentences that had either high-frequency main verbs (talk, run), or low-frequency main verbs (brag, swim), which were either correctly inflected (will swim), or incorrectly inflected (*will swam). We found a large, robust main N400 effect for verb frequency and a large, robust main P600 effect for grammaticality, with no interaction between lexical frequency and grammaticality. For example, ungrammatical low-frequency verbs (e.g., *will bragged) elicited an N400 that was indistinct from the N400 elicited by grammatical low-frequency verbs (will brag), and they elicited a P600 that was indistinct from the P600 elicited by high-frequency ungrammatical verbs (e.g., *will talked). Moreover, this biphasic pattern was consistent across regular (talk, brag) and irregular (run, swim) verb types. These results suggest that the processing of syntactic feature values (e.g., [+past]) associated with low-frequency lexical hosts is not delayed, or otherwise modulated, relative to the processing of syntactic features associated with high-frequency hosts. This in turn suggests that access to syntactic feature values during language comprehension is not obligatorily mediated through the stored lexical entries (e.g., lemma representations) of the word forms that express those features superficially.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo