MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Reading Words in the Meg Response

 Ramin Assadollahi and Friedemann Pulvermüller
  
 

Abstract:
Can a self-organising neuronal network classify single neuromagnetic recordings following presentation of individual words? There is evidence that spatio-temporal characteristics of the (averaged) brain response reflect word length and frequency (Osterhout et al. 1997) and aspects of word semantics (Pulvermüller 1999). Words from four categories were chosen: function words, action verbs, nouns primarily eliciting visual associations, and nouns with both strong visual and action associations. Word length (one/two syllables) and frequency (high/low) were also varied in an orthogonal design. The sixteen words (4 categories x 2 lengths x 2 frequencies) were presented visually to a single subject whose brain response was recorded by an 148 channel MEG. A neuronal net (Kohonen 1982) was trained on the field strength of 8 regions of interest. After learning, the network performed above chance on new testing data: In the recognition of the neuromagnetic signal from individual words its recognition rate was 28% above chance (Chi-square = 16.3, p<0.0001) and its accuracy was 44% above chance (Chi-square = 40.8, p<0.0001). The classification of brain responses into word categories was also unexpectedly high (recognition rate 16% above chance, Chi-square = 27.2, p<0.0001, accuracy 20% above chance, Chi-square = 42.0, p<0.0001). We conclude that unsupervised Kohonen maps can classify single word-evoked brain responses.

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo