MIT CogNet, The Brain Sciences ConnectionFrom the MIT Press, Link to Online Catalog
SPARC Communities
Subscriber : Stanford University Libraries » LOG IN

space

Powered By Google 
Advanced Search

 

Perisylvian Anatomy: Do Proportional Measures Make a Difference When Evaluating Sex Effects?

 A. B. Lane, David M. Corey, C. M. Leonard and Anne L. Foundas
  
 

Abstract:
While considerable attention has been directed towards defining criteria for anatomical regions of interest (ROI), the difference between absolute and. proportional measures has not been adequately addressed. Given that male brains tend to be larger than female brains, the use of raw volumes may overestimate the relative size of male structures. The purpose of this study was to compare proportional and volumetric measures in determining sex effects. MRI volume measures were obtained for total brain area (TBA) Heschl's gyrus (H), planum temporale (PT), posterior ascending ramus (PAR), and posterior superior temporal gyrus (pSTG) (left+right hemispheres) for 35 children (20 males, 15 females). Proportional measures were calculated for each ROI (100 x volume/total brain volume). TBA was significantly larger in males than females. A mixed MANOVA yielded a significant Sex by Measurement-Type interaction. Size differences between males and females varied dramatically according to whether volume or proportion scores were used. For H and PAR, males were found to have larger volumes than females, but the magnitude of the difference was significantly reduced with proportional measures. More importantly, the difference shifted direction for the PT and pSTG. Raw scores favored males in size; proportional scores favored females. Such differences would result in different conclusions regarding sex effects on the development of cortical structures. (Support NIDCD, MOD)

 
 


© 2010 The MIT Press
MIT Logo