Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volume 21 : Issue 3

Table of Contents

• A role for ovarian hormones in sexual differentiation of the brain 
  Roslyn Holly Fitch and Victor H. Denenberg
  Page 311-327
• To normalize or not to normalize for overall size? 
  Francisco Aboitiz
  Page 327-328
• Sexual differentiation of callosal size: Hormonal mechanisms and the choice of an animal model 
  M. J. Baum and S. A. Tobet
  Page 328-328
• More evidence for the role of estrogens in female differentiation of the brain 
  Klaus D. D;ouml;hler
  Page 329-330
• Sex-related differences in callosal morphology and specific callosal connectivity: How far can we go? 
  Stephanie Clarke
  Page 329-329
• Recipe for a sexually dimorphic brain: Ingredients include ovarian and testicular hormones 
  Diane F. Halpern
  Page 330-331
• Is the size of the human corpus callosum influenced by sex hormones? 
  Elizabeth Hampson
  Page 331-332
• Activation/organization, masculinization/feminization: What are they and how are they distinguished? 
  Melissa Hines
  Page 332-333
• Relative size of the human corpus callosum redux: Statistical smoke and mirrors? 
  Ralph L. Holloway
  Page 333-335
• Updates on axons in the rat corpus callosum 
  Janice M. Juraska
  Page 335-336
• Estrogens in human psychosexual differentiation 
  Heino F. L. Meyer-Bahlburg
  Page 336-337
• Female and flexible? 
  Jane Stewart
  Page 338-338
• Effect sizes and meta-analysis indicate no sex dimorphism in the human or rodent corpus callosum 
  Douglas Wahlsten and Katherine M. Bishop
  Page 338-339
• Ovarian influences on female development: Revolutionary or evolutionary? 
  Kim Wallen
  Page 339-340
• Parallel or serial processes in sexual differentiation? 
  Christina L. Williams and Noah J. Sandstrom
  Page 340-341
• Default is not in the female, but in the theory 
  Roslyn Holly Fitch and Victor H. Denenberg
  Page 341-346
• Testosterone and dominance in men 
  Allan Mazur and Alan Booth
  Page 353-363
• Androgens and human behaviour: A complex relationship 
  Paul F. Brain
  Page 363-364
• Problems with the concept of dominance and lack of empirical support for a testosterone;dominance link 
  John Archer
  Page 363-363
• Testosterone and dominance: Between-population variance and male energetics 
  Richard G. Bribiescas
  Page 364-365
• Primacy of organising effects of testosterone 
  Anne Campbell, Steven Muncer and Josie Odber
  Page 365-365
• Target tissue sensitivity, testosterone; social environment interactions, and lattice hierarchies 
  Kathleen C. Chambers
  Page 366-367
• Why is testosterone associated with divorce in men? 
  Elizabeth Cashdan
  Page 366-366
• Shaping, channelling, and distributing testosterone in social systems 
  Dov Cohen
  Page 367-368
• Seductive allure of dichotomies 
  Scott E. Christensen and S. Marc Breedlove
  Page 367-367
• Early organizational influences and social factors: A need for further evaluation 
  Marcia L. Collaer
  Page 368-369
• Dominance and aggression over the life course: Timing and direction of causal influences 
  John N. Constantino
  Page 369-369
• Prenatal testosterone exposure, left-handedness, and high school delinquency 
  Stanley Coren
  Page 369-370
• Of mice and men: Androgen dynamics in dominance and reproduction 
  Denys deCatanzaro and Emily Spironello
  Page 371-371
• Testosterone is non-zero, but what is its strength? 
  Victor H. Denenberg
  Page 372-372
• Evolutionary functions of neuroendocrine response to social environment 
  Mark Flinn, Charles Baerwald, Seamus Decker and Barry England
  Page 372-374
• Testosterone and the second sex 
  Jeffrey Foss
  Page 374-375
• Testosterone is not alone: Internal secretions and external behavior 
  Robin Fox
  Page 375-376
• Dominance runs deep 
  Valerie J. Grant
  Page 376-377
• Adult testosterone levels have little or no influence on dominance in men 
  Melissa Hines
  Page 377-378
• Fantasy, females, sexuality, and testosterone 
  Theodore D. Kemper
  Page 378-379
• Signalling via testosterone: Communicating health and vigour 
  Alejandro Kacelnik and Sasha Norris
  Page 378-378
• Testosterone-aggression relationship: An exemplar of interactionism 
  Linda Mealey
  Page 380-381
• Aggressiveness and dominance 
  Ulrich Mueller
  Page 381-382
• Placebo-controlled manipulations of testosterone levels and dominance 
  
  Page 382-383
• Of fish and men: A comparative approach to androgens and social dominance 
  Rui F. Oliveira
  Page 383-384
• The nurture of nature: Social, developmental, and environmental controls of aggression 
  Charles T. Snowdon
  Page 384-385
• Honour subcultures and the reciprocal model 
  James Steele
  Page 385-386
• Old issues and new perspectives on testosterone research 
  Alan Booth and Allan Mazur
  Page 386-390
• Dominance, sexual activity, and sexual emotions 
  John Marshall Townsend
  Page 386-386
• Innate talents: Reality or myth? 
  Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson and John A. Sloboda
  Page 399-407
• Testing the limits of the ontogenetic sources of talent and excellence 
  Paul B. Baltes
  Page 407-408
• Could the answer be talent? 
  Urie Bronfenbrenner and Stephen J. Ceci
  Page 409-410
• Explaining exceptional performance: Constituent abilities and touchstone phenomena 
  Neil Charness
  Page 410-411
• Fruitless polarities 
  Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
  Page 411-411
• Absurd environmentalism 
  Douglas K. Detterman, Lynne T. Gabriel and Joanne M. Ruthsatz
  Page 411-412
• Achievement: The importance of industriousness 
  Robert Eisenberger
  Page 412-413
• Basic capacities can be modified or circumvented by deliberate practice: A rejection of talent accounts of expert performance 
  K. Anders Ericsson
  Page 413-414
• Natural talents: An argument for the extremes 
  David Henry Feldman and Tamar Katzir
  Page 414-414
• Inborn talent exists 
  Joan Freeman
  Page 415-415
• A biased survey and interpretation of the nature;nurture literature 
  
  Page 415-416
• Might we adopt the learning-related account instead of the talent account? 
  Giyoo Hatano
  Page 416-417
• Experience is no improvement over talent 
  Kurt A. Heller and Albert Ziegler
  Page 417-418
• General intelligence is central to many forms of talent 
  Lloyd G. Humphreys
  Page 418-418
• Historical increases in expert performance suggest large possibilities for improvement of performance without implicating innate capacities 
  Andreas C. Lehmann
  Page 419-420
• Innate talents: A psychological tautology? 
  Sidney H. Irvine
  Page 419-419
• Genetic influence and cognitive abilities 
  Robert Plomin
  Page 420-421
• Talent scouts, not practice scouts: Talents are real 
  David C. Rowe
  Page 421-422
• What can we learn from highly developed special skills? 
  Michael Rutter
  Page 422-423
• Innate talent or deliberate practice as determinants of exceptional performance: Are we asking the right question? 
  Wolfgang Schneider
  Page 423-424
• Defining and finding talent: Data and a multiplicative model? 
  Dean Keith Simonton
  Page 424-425
• Practice, practice, practice ; Is that all it takes? 
  Janet Starkes and Werner Helsen
  Page 425-425
• Training quality and learning goals: Towards effective learning for all 
  Rosemary J. Stevenson
  Page 426-427
• Attributed talent is a powerful myth 
  Clemens Tesch-R;ouml;mer
  Page 427-427
• Cultural determinism is no better than biological determinism 
  Sandra E. Trehub and E. Glenn Schellenberg
  Page 427-428
• The rage to drink, or: Frontiers of expertise 
  Oliver Vitouch
  Page 428-429
• Creativity and practice 
  Robert W. Weisberg
  Page 429-430
• Individual differences in some special abilities are genetically influenced 
  Ada H. Zohar
  Page 431-432
• Natural born talents undiscovered 
  Michael J. A. Howe, Jane W. Davidson and John A. Sloboda
  Page 432-437
• Sex differences may indeed exist for 3-D navigational abilities: But was sexual selection responsible? 
  Peter Frost
  Page 443-444
• Sexual selection, the division of labor, and the evolution of sex differences 
  David C. Geary
  Page 444-447