Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volume 21 : Issue 4

Table of Contents

• Representation is representation of similarities 
  Shimon Edelman
  Page 449-467
• Chorus of k prototypes or discord of contradictory representations? 
  David R. Andresen and Chad J. Marsolek
  Page 467-468
• Seeing wood because of the trees? A case of failure in reverse-engineering 
  Philip J. Benson
  Page 468-468
• Representation is space-variant 
  Giorgio Bonmassar and Eric L. Schwartz
  Page 469-470
• Distal similarity, shape referents, subjective world, and redundancy 
  Hannes Eisler
  Page 470-470
• Appearance is more than shape, illumination, and pose 
  Jan-Olof Eklundh and Stefan Carlsson
  Page 470-471
• What is wrong with prototypes 
  
  Page 471-472
• Objects, please remain composed 
  Robert L. Goldstone
  Page 472-473
• Metric assumptions are neither necessary nor sufficient to describe similarities 
  Robert A. M. Gregson
  Page 473-473
• Representations need self-organizing top-down expectations to fit a changing world 
  Stephen Grossberg
  Page 473-474
• The notion of distal similarity is ill defined 
  Ulrike Hahn and Nick Chater
  Page 474-475
• Representation of similarities and correspondence structure 
  Nathan Intrator
  Page 475-475
• Representation of similarities ; a psychometric but not an explanatory concept for categorization 
  Martin J;uuml;ttner
  Page 475-476
• The Chorus scheme: Representation or isomorphism, holistic or analytic? 
  Cyril Latimer
  Page 476-477
• Boundary conditions and the need for multiple forms of representation 
  Arthur B. Markman and Takashi Yamauchi
  Page 477-478
• How to combine interpolation with feedback? 
  Guenther Palm
  Page 478-478
• Vector code differences and similarities 
  E. N. Sokolov
  Page 479-480
• Attentional dynamics and a chorus of geons 
  Eric Postma, Jaap van den Herik and Patrick Hudson
  Page 479-479
• Visual tasks require manipulable representations 
  Bradley V. Stuart
  Page 480-480
• A multiculture of veridicalities 
  J. van Brakel
  Page 481-482
• A neural basis for the Chorus model? 
  M. J. Tov;eacute;e
  Page 481-481
• Regular spaces versus computing with chaos 
  Cees van Leeuwen
  Page 482-484
• Shape representation by Second-order Isomorphism and the Chorus model: SIC 
  Shimon Edelman
  Page 484-493
• How is representation learned? 
  James R. Williamson
  Page 484-484
• The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production 
  Peter F. MacNeilage
  Page 499-511
• Motor cortex fields and speech movements: Simple dual control is implausible 
  James H. Abbs and Roxanne DePaul
  Page 511-512
• A new puzzle for the evolution of speech? 
  Christian Abry, Louis-Jean Bo;euml;, Rafael Laboissi;egrave;re and Jean-Luc Schwartz
  Page 512-513
• Cyclicity in speech derived from call repetition rather than from intrinsic cyclicity of ingestion 
  R. J. Andrew
  Page 513-514
• Embodiment, muscle sense, and memory for speech 
  Hugh W. Buckingham
  Page 515-515
• Distributed neural substrates and the evolution of speech production 
  Asif A. Ghazanfar and Donald B. Katz
  Page 516-517
• Premotor systems, language-related neurodynamics, and cetacean communication 
  Gary Goldberg and Roberta Brooks
  Page 517-518
• Content without a frame? The role of vocabulary biases in speech errors 
  Trevor A. Harley
  Page 518-519
• A syllable-centric framework for the evolution of spoken language 
  Steven Greenberg
  Page 518-518
• Speech evolved from vocalization, not mastication 
  Uwe J;uuml;rgens
  Page 519-520
• Is the syllable frame stored? 
  Willem J. M. Levelt and Niels O. Schiller
  Page 520-520
• Speech evolution: Let barking dogs sleep 
  Philip Lieberman
  Page 520-521
• A curiously ubiquitous articulatory movement 
  Bj;ouml;rn Lindblom
  Page 521-522
• Frame dominance: A developmental phenomenon? 
  Lorraine McCune
  Page 522-523
• Is speech just chewing the fat? 
  James P. Lund
  Page 522-522
• A multi-modal, emergent view of the development of syllables in early phonology 
  Lise Menn
  Page 523-524
• Articulatory evidence for syllabic structure 
  K. G. Munhall and J. A. Jones
  Page 524-525
• Content first, frame later 
  John J. Ohala
  Page 525-526
• Out of the mouths of babes . . . and beaks of birds? A broader interpretation of the frame/content theory for the evolution of speech production 
  Irene M. Pepperberg
  Page 526-527
• On mandibular oscillation as a source of variation in infant vocalizations 
  J;ouml;rg Peters
  Page 527-527
• What happened to Homo habilis? (Language and mirror neurons) 
  Giacomo Rizzolatti
  Page 527-528
• Ingestive and vocal mechanisms in birds: A parallel? 
  Jim Scanlan and Lesley Rogers
  Page 528-529
• Recent evidence of the involvement of lateral frontal cortex in primate cyclic ingestive movements 
  Barry J. Sessle
  Page 529-530
• An evolutionary model for the learning of language 
  Jechil S. Sieratzki and Bencie Woll
  Page 530-530
• Brain circuits ancient and modern 
  Stephen F. Walker
  Page 531-531
• Echo phonology: Signs of a link between gesture and speech 
  Bencie Woll and Jechil S. Sieratzki
  Page 531-532
• The frame/content view of speech: What survives, what emerges 
  Peter F. MacNeilage
  Page 532-538
• Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars 
  Scott Atran
  Page 547-569
• Cultural transmission with an evolved intuitive ontology: Domain-specific cognitive tracks of inheritance 
  Pascal Boyer
  Page 570-571
• Culture in cognitive science 
  Don Dedrick
  Page 571-572
• Doubts about a unified cognitive theory of taxonomic knowledge and its memic status 
  Roy Ellen
  Page 572-573
• Folk metaphysics and the anthropology of science 
  Michael T. Ghiselin
  Page 573-574
• Folk biology and external definitions 
  James A. Hampton
  Page 574-574
• Informal biology is a core domain, but its construction needs experience 
  Giyoo Hatano
  Page 575-575
• Xenophobia and other reasons to wonder about the domain specificity of folk-biological classification 
  Terence E. Hays
  Page 575-576
• A neurocognitive mechanism for folk biology? 
  Remo Job and Luca Surian
  Page 577-578
• Folk taxonomies and folk theories: The case of Williams syndrome 
  Susan C. Johnson
  Page 578-579
• Faculty before folk 
  Justin Leiber
  Page 579-580
• The source of universal concepts: A view from folk psychology 
  Angeline Lillard
  Page 580-580
• The case for general mechanisms in concept formation 
  Kenneth R. Livingston
  Page 581-582
• Domain-specificity in folk biology and color categorization: Modularity versus global process 
  Robert E. MacLaury
  Page 582-583
• Relations between innate endowments, cognitive development, domain specificity, and a taxonomy-creator 
  Adee Matan and Sidney Strauss
  Page 584-584
• A comparative and developmental approach to cognitive universals: A possible role for heterochrony 
  Warren P. Roberts
  Page 585-586
• What is rank? 
  Adam Morton
  Page 585-585
• Measuring cognitive universals and cultural particulars 
  A. Kimball Romney
  Page 586-587
• Innateness, universality, and domain-specificity 
  Gregg E. A. Solomon
  Page 588-589
• Cognitive universals, hierarchy, and the history and practice of biological systematics 
  P. F. Stevens
  Page 590-591
• The living individual and its kind 
  Michael Thompson
  Page 591-591
• Pulling the trigger on the living kind module 
  Peter M. Todd and Alejandro L;oacute;pez
  Page 592-592
• Taxonomic ranks, generic species, and core memes 
  Scott Atran
  Page 593-604
• Universal Grammar and the critical age 
  Julia Herschensohn
  Page 611-612
• Universal Grammar: Hypothesis space or grammar selection procedures? Is UG affected by Critical Periods? 
  Gita Martohardjono, Samuel David Epstein and Suzanne Flynn
  Page 612-614