Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volume 24 : Issue 3

Table of Contents

• Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? 
  Ralph Hertwig and Andreas Ortmann
  Page 383-403
• Purposes and methods 
  Jonathan Baron
  Page 403-403
• Financial incentives do not pave the road to good experimentation 
  Tilmann Betsch and Susanne Haberstroh
  Page 404-404
• Economic and psychological experimental methodology: Separating the wheat from the chaff 
  Hasker P. Davis and Robert L. Durham
  Page 405-406
• Typological thinking, statistical significance, and the methodological divergence of experimental psychology and economics 
  Charles F. Blaich and Humberto Barreto
  Page 405-405
• On accumulation of information and model selection 
  Ido Erev
  Page 406-407
• Behavioral and economic approaches to decision making: A common ground 
  Edmund Fantino and Stephanie Stolarz-Fantino
  Page 407-408
• Are we losing control? 
  Gerd Gigerenzer
  Page 408-409
• A good experiment of choice behavior is a good caricature of a real situation 
  Francisco J. Gil-White
  Page 409-410
• Theory-testing experiments in the economics laboratory 
  Anthony S. Gillies and Mary Rigdon
  Page 410-411
• The contribution of game theory to experimental design in the behavioral sciences 
  Herbert Gintis
  Page 411-412
• Are scripts or deception necessary when repeated trials are used? On the social context of psychological experiments 
  Adam S. Goodie
  Page 412-412
• Clear-cut designs versus the uniformity of experimental practice 
  Francesco Guala
  Page 412-413
• Doing it both ways ; experimental practice and heuristic context 
  Glenn W. Harrison and E. Elisabet Rutstr;ouml;m
  Page 413-414
• Challenges for everyone: Real people, deception, one-shot games, social learning, and computers 
  Joseph Henrich
  Page 414-415
• Is the challenge for psychologists to return to behaviourism? 
  Denis J. Hilton
  Page 415-416
• To what are we trying to generalize? 
  Robin M. Hogarth
  Page 416-417
• Varying the scale of financial incentives under real and hypothetical conditions 
  Charles A. Holt and Susan K. Laury
  Page 417-418
• Variability is not uniformly bad: The practices of psychologists generate research questions 
  Scott A. Huettel and Gregory Lockhead
  Page 418-419
• Why use real and hypothetical payoffs? 
  Anton K;uuml;hberger
  Page 419-420
• Are experimental economists behaviorists and is behaviorism for the birds? 
  Robert Kurzban
  Page 420-421
• In partial defense of softness 
  Daniel S. Levine
  Page 421-422
• Other scientific purposes, other methodological ways 
  Marie-Paule Lecoutre and Bruno Lecoutre
  Page 421-421
• We should not impose narrow restrictions on psychological methods 
  Michael Maratsos
  Page 422-423
• Choice output and choice processing: An analogy to similarity 
  Arthur B Markman
  Page 423-424
• Theorize it both ways? 
  Tim Rakow
  Page 425-426
• The game-theoretic innocence of experimental behavioral psychology 
  Don Ross
  Page 426-427
• Form and function in experimental design 
  Alvin E. Roth
  Page 427-428
• From old issues to new directions in experimental psychology and economics 
  Vernon L. Smith
  Page 428-429
• Different perspectives of human behavior entail different experimental practices 
  Ramzi Suleiman
  Page 429-429
• Self-interest as self-fulfilling prophecy 
  Mark Van Vugt
  Page 429-430
• Meta-theory rather than method fascism 
  Elke U. Weber
  Page 430-431
• Deception by researchers is necessary and not necessarily evil 
  David J. Weiss
  Page 431-432
• Individual psychology, market scaffolding, and behavioral tests 
  Daniel John Zizzo
  Page 432-433
• Money, lies, and replicability: On the need for empirically grounded experimental practices and interdisciplinary discourse 
  Ralph Hertwig and Andreas Ortmann
  Page 433-444
• Shortcomings of the HIT framework and possible solutions 
  Martin Arguin and Daniel Saumier
  Page 476-477
• Making living versus nonliving distinctions: Lessons from infants 
  Martha E. Arterberry
  Page 477-478
• Is category specificity in the world or in the mind? 
  H. Clark Barrett
  Page 478-479
• Limitations on current explanations of category-specific agnosia 
  Daniel Bub and Cindy Bukach
  Page 479-480
• Beyond the sensory/functional dichotomy 
  George S. Cree and Ken McRae
  Page 480-481
• Category-specific deficits: Will a simpler model do? 
  Jules Davidoff
  Page 481-482
• Conceptual deficits without features: A view from atomism 
  Roberto G. de Almeida
  Page 482-483
• Structural descriptions in HIT ; a problematic commitment 
  Markus Graf and Werner X. Schneider
  Page 483-484
• Category-specific deficits and exemplar models 
  Koen Lamberts
  Page 484-485
• What is structural similarity and is it greater in living things? 
  Keith R. Laws
  Page 486-487
• What is specific about category specificity? Fractionating patterns of impairments and the spurious living/nonliving dichotomy 
  E. C. Leek and E. M. Pothos
  Page 487-488
• The sensory/functional assumption or the data: Which do we keep? 
  Bradford Mahon and Alfonso Caramazza
  Page 488-489
• On disentangling and weighting kinds of semantic knowledge 
  Agnesa Pillon and Dana Samson
  Page 490-490
• Mutual access and mutual dependence of conceptual components 
  Friedemann Pulverm;uuml;ller
  Page 490-492
• Further evidence in support of a distributed semantic memory system 
  Eleanor M. Saffran and H. Branch Coslett
  Page 492-493
• Where are object properties? In the world or in the mind? 
  James Tanaka
  Page 493-494
• About numbers as a semantic category 
  Marc Thioux, Eva Turconi, Emanuelle Palmers and Xavier Seron
  Page 494-495
• Concepts and categories: What is the evidence for neural specialisation? 
  Lorraine K. Tyler and Helen E. Moss
  Page 495-496
• Putting semantics back into the semantic representation of living things 
  Deborah Zaitchik and Gregg E. A. Solomon
  Page 496-497
• Category specificity in mind and brain? 
  Glyn W. Humphreys and Emer M. E. Forde
  Page 497-504
• A general account of selection: Biology, immunology, and behavior 
  David L. Hull, Rodney E. Langman and Sigrid S. Glenn
  Page 511-528
• Should we essentially ignore the role of stimuli in a general account of operant selection? 
  Rick A. Bevins
  Page 528-529
• Two stumbling blocks to a general account of selection: Replication and information 
  William M. Baum
  Page 528-528
• A single-process learning theory 
  Marion Blute
  Page 529-531
• A neural-network interpretation of selection in learning and behavior 
  Jos;eacute; E Burgos
  Page 531-533
• Selection as a cause versus the causes of selection 
  A. Charles Catania
  Page 533-533
• Does terminology from biology work in the realm of operant behaviour? 
  Mecca Chiesa
  Page 533-534
• Heeding Darwin but ignoring Bernard: External behaviors are not selected, internal goals are 
  Gary A. Cziko
  Page 534-535
• Selection and the unification of science 
  Jay N. Eacker
  Page 535-536
• election: Unexplored and underexplored realms 
  David A. Eckerman and Steven M. Kemp
  Page 536-537
• Replication or reproduction?: Symbiogenesis as an alternative theory 
  Michael Glassman
  Page 537-538
• Do operant behaviors replicate? 
  Todd Grantham
  Page 538-539
• The role of information and replication in selection processes 
  Peter Godfrey-Smith
  Page 538-538
• On the origins of complexity 
  Bruce E. Hesse and Gary Novak
  Page 540-541
• Sharing terms and concepts under the selectionist umbrella: Difficult but worthwhile 
  Philip N. Hineline
  Page 541-542
• Selection in operant learning may fit a general model 
  Julian C. Leslie
  Page 542-543
• Concerns of old, revisited 
  Gregory J. Madden
  Page 543-544
• Operant learning and selectionism: Risks and benefits of seeking interdisciplinary parallels 
  Richard W. Malott
  Page 544-544
• Evolution and operant behavior, metaphor or theory? 
  Frances K. McSweeney and Kenjiro Aoyama
  Page 545-546
• How (and why) Darwinian selection restricts environmental feedback 
  Mohan Matthen
  Page 545-545
• A more pluralist typology of selection processes 
  Bence Nanay
  Page 547-548
• Are theories of selection necessary? 
  H. S. Pennypacker
  Page 549-550
• Selection without multiple replicators? 
  John W. Pepper and Thorbj;oslash;rn Knudsen
  Page 550-551
• Activity anorexia: Biological, behavioral, and neural levels of selection 
  W. David Pierce
  Page 551-552
• Replication in selective systems: Multiplicity of carriers, variation of information, iteration of encounters 
  George N. Reeke
  Page 552-553
• Variations and active versus reactive behavior as factors of the selection processes 
  V. S. Rotenberg
  Page 553-554
• Creativity as cognitive selection: The blind-variation and selective-retention model 
  Dean Keith Simonton
  Page 554-556
• Selection: Information and replication of the operant 
  Ralph Spiga
  Page 556-557
• Avoiding vicious circularity requires more than a modicum of care 
  Nicholas S. Thompson
  Page 557-558
• Is operant selectionism coherent? 
  Fran;ccedil;ois Tonneau and Michel B. C. Sokolowski
  Page 558-559
• Are units of retention necessary? 
  Manish Vaidya
  Page 559-559
• At last: Serious consideration 
  David L. Hull, Rodney E. Langman and Sigrid S. Glenn
  Page 559-569