Behavioral and Brain Sciences

Volume 24 : Issue 4

Table of Contents

• Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world 
  Roger N. Shepard
  Page 581-601
• The exploitation of regularities in the environment by the brain 
  Horace Barlow
  Page 602-607
• Regularities of the physical world and the absence of their internalization 
  Heiko Hecht
  Page 608-617
• Internalization: A metaphor we can live without 
  Michael Kubovy and William Epstein
  Page 618-625
• Evolutionary internalized regularities 
  Robert Schwartz
  Page 626-628
• Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference 
  Joshua B. Tenenbaum and Thomas L. Griffiths
  Page 629-640
• Is kinematic geometry an internalized regularity? 
  Dejan Todorovi
  Page 641-651
• Colour generalisation by domestic chicks 
  R. Baddeley, D. Osorio and C. D. Jones
  Page 654-654
• Generality, mathematical elegance, and evolution of numerical/object identity 
  Felice L. Bedford
  Page 654-655
• If a tree falls in the forest and there is nobody around, does Chasles theorem still apply? 
  Marco Bertamini
  Page 655-656
• First, we assume a spherical cow ...  
  Lera Boroditsky and Michael Ramscar
  Page 656-657
• Color constancy: A case for multiple levels and paradigms 
  Michael H. Brill
  Page 658-658
• Colour perception may optimize biologically relevant surface discriminations rather than type-I constancy 
  Nicola Bruno and Stephen Westland
  Page 658-659
• Universal generalization and universal inter-item confusability 
  Nick Chater, Paul M. B. Vitnyi and Neil Stewart
  Page 659-660
• Generalization and Tinbergens four whys 
  Ken Cheng
  Page 660-661
• Which colour space(s) is Shepard talking about? 
  Lieven Decock and Jaap van Brakel
  Page 661-662
• Universal Bayesian inference? 
  David Dowe and Graham Oppy
  Page 662-663
• External regularities and adaptive signal exchanges in the brain 
  Birgitta Dresp
  Page 663-664
• Neural spaces: A general framework for the understanding of cognition? 
  Shimon Edelman
  Page 664-665
• Natural groups of transformations underlying apparent motion and perceived object shape and color 
  David H. Foster
  Page 665-668
• Interpreting screw displacement apparent motion as a self-organizing process 
  T. D. Frank, A. Daffertshofer and P. J. Beek
  Page 668-669
• Exhuming similarity 
  Dedre Gentner
  Page 669-669
• The place of Shepard in the world of perception 
  Walter Gerbino
  Page 669-671
• The evolution of color vision 
  Ian Gold
  Page 671-671
• What are we talking about here? 
  John Heil
  Page 671-672
• What is the probability of the Bayesian model, given the data? 
  Evan Heit
  Page 672-673
• Adaptation as genetic internalization 
  Adolf Heschl
  Page 673-674
• Group theory and geometric psychology 
  William C. Hoffman
  Page 674-676
• Learning to internalize: A developmental perspective 
  Bruce Hood
  Page 676-677
• Internalized constraints in the representation of spatial layout 
  Helene Intraub
  Page 677-678
• Reliance on constraints means detection of information 
  David M. Jacobs, Sverker Runeson and Isabell E.K. Andersson
  Page 679-680
• What is internalized? 
  Mary K. Kaiser
  Page 680-681
• The internalization of physical constraints from a developmental perspective 
  Horst Krist
  Page 681-682
• The archeology of internalism 
  Martin Kurthen
  Page 682-683
• Internalization of physical laws as revealed by the study of action instead of perception 
  Francesco Lacquaniti and Mirka Zago
  Page 684-685
• Extending Bayesian concept learning to deal with representational complexity and adaptation 
  Michael D. Lee
  Page 685-686
• Representation of basic kinds: Not a case of evolutionary internalization of universal regularities 
  Dennis Lomas
  Page 686-687
• Three deadly sins of category learning modelers 
  Bradley C. Love
  Page 687-688
• Tribute to an ideal exemplar of scientist and person 
  Dominic W. Massaro
  Page 688-689
• Whats within? Can the internal structure of perception be derived from regularities of the external world? 
  Rainer Mausfeld
  Page 689-690
• Probabilistic functionalism: A unifying paradigm for the cognitive sciences 
  Javier R. Movellan and Jonathan D. Nelson
  Page 690-692
• Beyond an occult kinematics of the mind 
  Keith K. Niall
  Page 692-695
• Functional resemblance and the internalization of rules 
  Gerard OBrien and Jon Opie
  Page 695-696
• The mathematics of symmetry does not provide an appropriate model for the human understanding of elementary motions 
  John R. Pani
  Page 696-697
• Evaluating spatial transformation procedures as universals 
  Lawrence M. Parsons
  Page 697-698
• Reflections on what timescale? 
  John Pickering
  Page 698-699
• Context effects equally applicable in generalization and similarity 
  Emmanuel M. Pothos
  Page 699-700
• Shepards pie: The other half 
  Karl H. Pribram
  Page 700-700
• Regularities, context, and neural coding: Are universals reflected in the experienced world? 
  Antonino Raffone, Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Cees van Leeuwen
  Page 701-702
• An alternate route toward a science of mind 
  David A. Schwartz
  Page 702-703
• Sphericity in cognition 
  E. N. Sokolov
  Page 703-704
• Shepards mirrors or Simons scissors? 
  Peter M. Todd and Gerd Gigerenzer
  Page 704-705
• Measurement theory is a poor model of the relation of kinematic geometry and perception of motion 
  Dejan Todorovi
  Page 705-706
• Minimization of modal contours: An instance of an evolutionary internalized geometric regularity? 
  Giorgio Vallortigara and Luca Tommasi
  Page 706-707
• Toward a generative transformational approach to visual perception 
  Douglas Vickers
  Page 707-708
• Whats in a structure? 
  Virgil Whitmyer
  Page 708-709
• Dynamics, not kinematics, is an adequate basis for perception 
  Andrew Wilson and Geoffrey P. Bingham
  Page 709-710
• Internalized constraints may function as an emulator 
  Margaret Wilson
  Page 710-711
• Shepards Response On the possibility of universal mental laws: A reply to my critics 
  Roger N. Shepard
  Page 712-148
• The role of statistics in perception 
  Horace Barlow
  Page 748-748
• Universal internalization or pluralistic micro-theories? 
  Heiko Hecht
  Page 749-755
• Internalization: A metaphor we can live without 
  Michael Kubovy and William Epstein
  Page 756-757
• Regularities in motion: Apparent, real and internalized 
  Robert Schwartz
  Page 757-762
• Some specifics about generalization 
  Joshua B. Tenenbaum and Thomas L. Griffiths
  Page 762-778
• Is kinematic geometry an internalized regularity? 
  Dejan Todorovic
  Page 778-778